The 50-40-10 happiness rule is trending again – but can you really control how happy you are?

Pics: Getty Images

What is the 50-40-10 rule of happiness?

The 50-40-10 rule of happiness is a model published by psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky and her colleagues. Often illustrated as a pie chart divided into three sections, it suggests that differences in happiness are influenced by three broad factors:

• 50 per cent: genetics or inherited characteristics
• 40 per cent: intentional activities and habits, such as exercise, friendships and the lifestyle choices we make
• 10 per cent: life circumstances, including health, work and where we live

It’s an appealingly simple formula – particularly because it appears to suggest that a significant proportion of our happiness is within our control. But can something as complex as happiness really be broken down into percentages?

Why is the 50-40-10 rule trending again?

Although the model is more than 20 years old, it has found a new audience on social media.

Its resurgence comes at a time when loneliness and social isolation are increasingly being discussed, while buzzwords such as “wellbeing” and “longevity” have fuelled our desire to find ways to live happier, healthier lives.

Social media is also awash with “happiness hacks”, morning routines and supposedly life-changing habits, while growing interest in positive psychology has encouraged people to think more closely about what actually makes them happy.

However, while the 50-40-10 model was once widely cited as a rule of thumb, many experts now caution against taking those percentages literally. Critics argue that the model oversimplifies happiness and may be particularly problematic for people dealing with difficult circumstances.

We asked two mental health experts whether the figures really add up.

Why you shouldn’t take the 40 per cent literally

According to mental health expert and therapist Matt Grammar, the rule can be a useful motivational tool – but it shouldn’t be treated as a mathematical equation.

“The original model broke up differences in happiness across populations,” he explained. “The model was not able to demonstrate that 40% of any person’s happiness is consciously controllable.

“Genetics, circumstances, relationships and behaviours all interact and influence happiness, so they cannot be separated as neatly as slices of a pie. The original authors accepted criticism of the percentages.

“As a therapist, I am especially careful about giving people what is essentially an unsupportable and certainly not a mathematically provable equation. Circumstances do not account for only 10%.

“Trauma, chronic illness, financial instability, discrimination and toxic relationships can adversely affect wellbeing. Presenting happiness as an almost entirely mindset-related phenomenon can be deeply disturbing and unintentionally damaging to those suffering trauma, chronic illness or injustice inequality.”

Think of it as your ‘zone of influence’ instead

Rather than focusing on controlling 40 per cent of our happiness, Matt suggests thinking about the parts of our lives we can influence.

“I would replace the ‘40%’ with a zone of influence. People can strengthen that zone by scheduling enjoyable activities; protecting sleep, movement, recovery time and healthy boundaries; reducing avoidance, emotional suppression; and consistent savouring and gratitude.

“These practices improve wellbeing, and though the average effects are more modest than the pie chart suggests, evidence supports their value.

“The 50-40-10 rule has value as a motivational idea, but it should not be treated as a mathematical equation for an individual’s happiness.”

Importantly, this approach also recognises that people experiencing burnout or difficult life circumstances cannot simply “think positively” and expect to feel better.

“A common reason people give for not practicing CBT is burnout. These people can’t simply ‘think positively’ themselves into a better mood, but they can protect their need for sleep, address one of their most draining boundaries, reconnect with a friend and schedule an activity that provides them with meaning and pleasure.

“These things don’t remove the difficult circumstances in their life, but they improve the ability for them to respond to these circumstances.”

Is 50 per cent of happiness really genetic?

Dr Linda Dolin, Medical Director of The Sylvia Brafman Mental Health Center, also challenges the idea that the percentages can be applied neatly to individuals.

“It is first important to note that the study itself measures not individual happiness, but the happiness of whole populations. So, the 50% which is said to be genetic is not down to our individual genes, but rather refers to a high average correlation between the happiness of family members.

“The same applies to the 10% which comes down to experiences: this is not exclusively down to experiences which we cannot control, but rather a correlation between those who have had the same experiences. We have control over at least some of our experiences, which complicates this claim quite a bit.”

In other words, the apparently clear-cut slices of the happiness pie aren’t as separate as they might initially appear.

Your happiness isn’t set in stone

Dr Dolin also stresses that even traits that are heritable aren’t necessarily fixed for life.

“With this in mind, we can see that the 50-40-10 rule is muddier than it appears. Not only do we have some say over what our life experiences are like, even if 50% of our happiness is heritable – though, as I have said, not genetic – heritable traits are not invariant.

“Intelligence, for example, has a large heritable aspect, but that does not mean that it is unable to be changed; it can be improved via education, for instance.

“In much the same way, the 50% of our happiness that is heritable is not a set baseline that cannot be influenced, but, like intelligence, can be improved in various ways. A natural disposition to happiness may be worn down by life events beyond one’s control, or a naturally sullen disposition may improve through daily habits.

“The hard-and-fast limits implied by the 50-40-10 Rule are in fact porous, and the use of terminology like ‘genetics’ and ‘experience’ can be slippery.”

Ultimately, Dr Dolin believes it may be more useful to think about all the different influences on our happiness as interconnected rather than trying to assign each one a percentage.

“Though there are ways we could amend the rule to account for this, the notion that we can clearly isolate and demarcate between the different factors that influence happiness is itself questionable.

“It is likely more helpful, clinically and personally, to think of these factors as all influencing one another rather than acting as three discrete blocks of experience.”

Five ways to boost your ‘happiness zone’

So, while you might want to forget about trying to achieve a precise 40 per cent, there are still everyday habits that could help support your wellbeing.

Get moving: Exercise can have positive effects on mood and wellbeing, so finding a form of movement you genuinely enjoy can be a good place to start.

Practise gratitude: Keeping a gratitude journal or simply taking time to notice positive moments can encourage you to focus on things you appreciate in your everyday life.

Help someone else: Acts of kindness can provide a sense of purpose and connection – sometimes referred to as the “helper’s high”.

Nurture close relationships: Make time for the people who matter to you. Connecting with friends and loved ones can provide emotional support, enjoyment and a greater sense of belonging.

Learn something new: Whether it’s taking up a hobby, learning a language or mastering a new skill, working towards something can provide a valuable sense of achievement.

The takeaway? The 50-40-10 rule may offer a useful reminder that some aspects of our wellbeing can be influenced by the choices we make. But happiness is far too complicated to be reduced to a neat mathematical formula – and there is no magic percentage you need to achieve.